Posts

Showing posts from July, 2019

O-1 V/S H1-B VISA

The first step of the U.S. employment-based non-immigrant visa application process is choosing the category with the best prospects for an individual applicant. While the O-1 and H-1B are both temporary visas, each of these two classifications come with distinct characteristics which must be clearly understood. The O-1 and H-1B each have unique advantages that may or may not apply to every prospective applicant. To know for certain which option is best suited for your client, reach out to us to avail world-class  Legal Process Outsourcing  services. This article is devoted to exploring the choice between an H-1B and O-1. COMMON CHARACTERISTICS: There is an overlap between O-1 and H-1B visas, principally with respect to the nature of the professional occupation of the alien and his or her credentials. The H-1B visa allows foreign professionals in specialty occupations to come to the U.S. temporarily to work for a U.S. employer. H-1B holders typically work in such fields as eng

NIW as compared to its parallel Petitions –

Meaning Unlike the first preference category (EB-1), EB-2 generally requires a specific, permanent job offer and a corresponding approved labor certification. The potential beneficiary has to rely on the employer to petition on his/her behalf. The labor certification process can be a very time consuming and costly affair for potential employers. This is remedied by the NIW or the National Interest Waiver provision for EB-2. Under this provision, an individual may seek a waiver of the otherwise required offer of employment and thus corresponding labor certification, by establishing that his/her admission to permanent residency would be in the so called “National Interest”. As a result, potential beneficiaries can petition on their own behalf. The National Interest Waiver (NIW) waives a labor certification and the necessity of having an offer of employment, but it does not waive the basic "entry" requirements for second preference classification. Therefore, only after the

What Could be Pros and Cons of Legal Process Outsourcing

LPO/Legal Process Outsourcing identifies this procedure wherein law firms and legal businesses outsource their lawful procedures to an offshore service provider. LPO/Legal Process Outsourcing identifies this procedure wherein law firms and legal businesses outsource their lawful procedures to an offshore service provider. SKJ Juris Is a client focused organization that provides valid help/assistance strictly adhering to the principles and confidentiality of their company at quite reasonable price. We operate with a skilful mix of technical, forensic and legal experience. LPO's Reduce the load of spent price on regions like legal investigation, skilled labour, record review, due diligence, contract management, infrastructure. Outsourcing dramatically decreases the operating cost by half an hour. Therefore, the decrease of price helps to spend more earnings in the center regions of your law business. 24/7 service: Legal Process provide 24/7 availability of consumer care. T

Why Legal Process Outsourcing Is an Emerging Need of Law Firms?

Image
Introduction The advantages of legal process outsourcing have lured law firms into transacting business with such firms/companies. The global recession and meltdown was the period which set the trend for outsourcing legal processes, as during this time the law firms were flooded with suits. Law firms through the past three decades have had a quantum jump, for good. Law firms have grown both in scope and in structure. The legal acumen of the citizens, which impels them to take legal recourse, has led to a surge in the profits of the law firms. With such an increase in profits, the law firms have invested in marketing and have taken global strides. After the boom and good business, the law firms now are oriented to reduce costs, while maximizing business value and ensuring customer satisfaction. Need for LPO arising from the urge for cost-optimization A U.S. or a U.K. law firm has to pay comparatively more to an untrained in-house lawyer, than a cost at which a skilled